Reader (and GLRRA racer) Ron Henning of Kalamazoo, Michigan sent this e-mail to Roadracing World in response to our item quoting Erik Buell explaining his take on the recent AMA Pro Thunder rules-change controversy (see roadracingworld.com, Breaking News, January 26): “‘One of the tough things you have to do is grow up and be more mature’ says Erik Buell. “Is it immature for a rider to voice complaints about a rule change that threatens a class and will cost the rider several thousand dollars? Or is Erik Buell saying that the AMA cares about input from the manufacturers (who have sponsorship money) but not from the sniveling, ‘immature’ riders trying to race on a shoestring? Let’s face it, we all know who the AMA is willing to listen to. But let’s not blame the rider’s ‘immaturity’ when their poverty is really the reason they were shunted out of this decision. “First, let me say that I don’t race Pro-thunder or even AMA. I don’t have an axe to grind and have never personally had any problem with AMA rules or officials. But Erik Buell’s ‘defense’ of the Pro Thunder rule changes is laughable.” “‘They notified us before they made the changes (to the Pro Thunder rules),’ said Buell in a telephone interview with Roadracing World. ‘I make it a point to talk to them (AMA officials) and just check on things. They didn’t call me on the phone.'” “By his own admission, he wasn’t notified of the rule changes until he called and asked. So is the average rider supposed to be comforted by the fact that Erik Buell had good enough connections within the AMA to receive advance notification (if he asks the right questions)? Does Buell really think that Joe Racer is going to get the same cooperation he does? And does AMA really expect every race team to call several times a season (and in the off season) just to ask if anything might be changed ‘someday’?” “‘(The communication problems between the riders and the AMA) is probably more the riders’ fault than anyone else. These guys need to be professional and call up and ask. Could it be better? Probably. But they have a group that is willing to listen. I tell young racers, ‘Man, it used to be worse. You better believe it.’ There was no way that you were gonna get heard in the old days. I think the AMA’s a much better organization than it was. I think they are trying to be very straight and honest.'” “In the ‘old days’ Erik Buell wasn’t the owner of a major manufacturer, just another one of us ‘unprofessional’ racers. Whether the AMA has improved from Erik’s ‘bad old days’ is a point of debate, but to blame a lack of communication on the riders because they didn’t ask is incredulous. ‘If they don’t ask, we don’t tell’ is a stupid policy that only a bureaucratic organization like the military (or the AMA) could devise.”

Lockhart-Phillips USA President Wendell Phillips interrupted his vacation in Hawaii to call Roadracing World headquarters and talk about his company’s new sponsorship of the AMA Formula Xtreme class, saying, “We enjoyed sponsoring the 750 (Supersport) class. I think we sponsored that class for five years. When the Formula Xtreme class became available, the AMA called to tell us. We were happy to move up to Formula Xtreme because we see it as a stepping stone to the Superbike class. Plus, the 750 class had turned into a one-make class with the Suzuki 750. In Formula Xtreme, there are many different brands of bikes with Suzuki’s new GSX-R1000, the Honda CBR929RR, and the others. It helps highlight the fact that Lockhart-Phillips USA makes parts and accessories for many different brands of bikes. We also like the fact that the Formula Xtreme class has its own show on Speedvision. The 750 class used to, but it went away around 1996. I’m excited about the Formula Xtreme class. We also sponsor the Unlimited Superbike class in Formula USA. We think the two classes go together hand-in-hand.” When asked about his feelings about the Formula Xtreme class not running at Daytona, Phillips said, “I haven’t talked to them (AMA) about that. I don’t know their reasoning for Formula Xtreme not running at Daytona, but let’s just say that General Motors isn’t gonna make the Camaro faster than the Corvette although they could.”

What follows is the conclusion of the Appeals Court decision in the Edmondson v. AMA case, in which liability on the part of the AMA is affirmed, the order for the AMA to pay limited damages related to some of Edmondson’s claims is affirmed, and a new trial ordered on the amount of damages related to other claims made by Edmondson. It is worth noting that the Appeals Court characterized the behavior of the AMA and its Board of Trustees by saying “The conduct was certainly unethical and had the capacity to deceive.” The Appeals Court mentioned Trustees Carl Reynolds and Cary Agajanian by name in its decision. The entire decision may be read by clicking on a link at the end of our earlier posting on the matter. Now, to the conclusion of the Appeals Court: “In conclusion, we: (1) affirm the judgment with respect to Edmondson’s conversion claim pertaining to the Mailing List; (2) vacate the judgment with respect to Edmondson’s claim for conversion of his business assets and interests that he brought to the 1994 joint venture and remand for a new trial with proper instructions outlined in Part IV of this opinion; (3) affirm the judgment with respect to Edmondson’s claim alleging tortious interference with contracts; (4) vacate the judgment in favor of Edmondson with respect to his constructive fraud claim and remand with instructions that the district court enter judgment in favor of the AMA with respect to that claim; (5) vacate the judgment as it pertains to the district court’s conclusion that the Defendants’ failure to disclose the terms and/or nature of television coverage contracts for motorcycle races produced by the joint venture violated S 75-1.1; (6) affirm the liability portion of the judgment in favor of Edmondson with respect to the balance of the Defendants’ conduct the district court concluded violatedS 75-1.1; (7) affirm the portion of the judgment allowing Edmondson to recover the trebled amounts of his actual damages flowing from the Defendants’ violations of S 75-1.1 in connection with their conversion of the Mailing List and tortious interference with Edmondson’s actual and prospective contractual rights; (8) vacate the portion of the judgment allowing Edmondson to recover the trebled amount of damages the district court presumed the jury found with respect to the Defendants’ exclusion of Edmondson from his business and remand for a new trial on damages as to that issue; (9) vacate the punitive damages award and remand for a retrial on that issue; and (10) vacate the award for attorneys’ fees and disbursements and remand for the district court to reconsider Edmondson’s motion for attorneys’ fees and disbursements at the conclusion of all other proceedings on remand. “AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED”

Breaking News Feb. 2, 5:45 p.m. EST Sources close to Dorna, promoters of the Grand Prix World Championship series, confirmed today that a promoting group is attempting to put together a U.S. Grand Prix at Barber Motorsports Park, near Birmingham, Alabama, in 2002. Although details were not available at post time, the proposed deal is believed to be for between 3 and 6 years. The track already has undergone one pre-homologation inspection by Franco Uncini, but FIM, IRTA, and Dorna officials have not seen the track with final asphalt laid on the road course. The uncertain status of the proposed deal was not enough to keep the would-be promoters from calling certain U.S. riders and discussing their potential wild card status for the event.

Arai Helmets is selling a very limited edition Joey Dunlop Replica helmet with all of the profits going to a fund benefiting the late Joey Dunlop’s family and favorite charities. To maximize the profit reaching the fund, Arai is selling the helmets online at www.araiamericas.com. The price is $600 and includes an Arai Quantum/f helmet in Dunlop’s distinctive yellow and black design, a letter of authenticity and a commemorative photo of Joey Dunlop. Orders must be placed by February 8, 2001.

Breaking News Feb. 2, 5:55 p.m. EST The US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today that the AMA was guilty as charged in the Edmondson v. AMA case, but ordered a new trial to determine the exact amount of damages. The only issue to be determined in the new trial is the value of Roger Edmondson’s share of a joint business venture he was involved in with the AMA. In other words, the court said that the AMA is guilty, but because the trial judge did not allow the jury to distinguish between tangible and intangible assets when it decided on the amount of damages, that issue must be re-tried. Legal sources familiar with the trial said that the new litigation could cost the AMA an additional $1 million or more in legal fees. The appeals court also ruled that the AMA’s conduct justified the application of North Carolina’s treble damages statutes. AMA offices were closed when Roadracing World learned of the decision, and AMA officials could not be contacted for comment prior to posting. Update, Feb. 3, 1:00 a.m. EST Sources close to AMA employees now say that the AMA views the ruling as a huge victory because the Appeals Court only confirmed about $240,000 in damages, set aside a punitive damages award, and ordered the retrial on the issues of additional damages and punitive damages. The appeals court also vacated the award of attorneys fees to Edmondson and ordered the trial judge to reconsider his order that the AMA pay Edmondson’s attorneys fees after a jury in the retrial determines a final damage award. Sources close to Edmondson’s legal team, meanwhile said the decision was a victory for Edmondson because his legal team could now “take another bite of the apple” with a chance to increase the damages awarded by the first jury. Those sources also said that the retrial could double the legal fees the AMA could have to pay, for its own lawyers as well as Edmondson’s lawyers, depending upon the final verdict and the trial judge’s decision. In a sense, both sides are claiming victory. But the fact that the AMA acted improperly and owes Roger Edmondson damages of at least $240,000 has been ruled on and confirmed by the Appeals Court. We’ll have to await the retrial to know the final bill that AMA members will pay for the entire affair. Read the Appeals Court decision yourself.

Young Gun Tony “The Tiger” Meiring, 17, says that he signed a contract with Corona EBSCO Suzuki on January 31. Meiring plans to compete in the AMA 750cc Supersport class on a GSX-R750 fielded by the team, which is sponsored by Corona Beer and EBSCO Media. Team owner Landers Sevier did not return a phone call asking him to comment on details of the team and the new deal with the youngster from Tracy, California. Roadracing World believes that the deal will make Meiring the youngest beer-sponsored rider in U.S. history.

American Kenny Noyes, 22, will compete on a Honda CBR600F4i fielded by Team Quersano in the Spanish Supersport Championship. The team plans to run Bridgestone tires in the series, which allows significant machine modifications along the lines of the Supersport World Championship Series. Noyes won the F-USA Pro Singles (dirt track) National Championship in 2000 aboard a Husaberg 400, and competed in selected local road races on a Suzuki GSX-R600. Kenny Noyes is the son of television commentator (and former racer) Dennis Noyes, who, in 1986, won two Spanish National Championships (600 and endurance) and finished second in Superbike. Dennis Noyes finished third in the final round of the 1986 Spanish Endurance Championship, a 24-hour at Barcelona, to lock up his title and become the oldest Spanish National Champion in history, at age 43.

Frustrated by a lack of dry test time at Laguna Seca last week and by no track time at Sears Point Sunday and Monday due to wet conditions, the Yoshimura Suzuki team heads to Spring Mountain Motorsports Park in Pahrump, Nevada today and tomorrow. The team hopes that their third try in two weeks to log meaningful test time will work out.