AMA Pro Racing Sues Clear Channel Over Supercross Deal

AMA Pro Racing Sues Clear Channel Over Supercross Deal

© 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

Categories:

From a press release issued by AMA Pro Racing:

PICKERINGTON, OHIO –

Paradama Productions, Inc., d/b/a AMA Pro Racing, announced today that it has filed a lawsuit in federal district court seeking an injunction against Clear Channel Motorsports. The complaint seeks enforcement of the Supercross Sanctioning Agreement signed by AMA Pro Racing and Clear Channel Motorsports in March 2002, which stipulates that AMA Pro Racing maintains the exclusive rights to sanction Clear Channel’s events included in the AMA Supercross Series.

The lawsuit, filed yesterday in Columbus, Ohio, stems, in part, from Clear Channel Motorsports’ allowing the Federation Internationale de Motocyclisme (FIM) to take over sanctioning and rules-enforcement for Clear Channel’s events included in the AMA Supercross Series.

“Clear Channel Motorsports, along with the FIM, are attempting to combine the AMA Supercross Series with smaller events in Europe and create a new series under the FIM banner. Undoubtedly, this is not in the best interest of American racers, teams or Supercross fans,” said Scott Hollingsworth, CEO of AMA Pro Racing. “We will not stand by idly while AMA Supercross is dismantled in this fashion. Outside meddling in AMA Supercross will only result in a weakened series as well as confusion among all parties.”

AMA Pro Racing is an independent subsidiary of the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) responsible for managing the AMA Supercross Series on behalf of the Association. The AMA is a 270,000-member not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to pursue, protect and promote the interests of motorcyclists, while serving the needs of its members. Under the terms of the contract between AMA Pro Racing and Clear Channel Motorsports, AMA Pro Racing maintains the exclusive right to sanction all 15 Clear Channel Motorsports-promoted rounds of the 16-race AMA Supercross Series. Neither the AMA nor the FIM is a party to that contract.

“Our agreement with Clear Channel is unambiguous in this regard,” said Hollingsworth. “Clear Channel does not have the right to allow the FIM to sanction any event in the AMA Supercross Series or to commandeer the 28 years of AMA Supercross and rename it the FIM World Supercross GP. The FIM has repeatedly failed in its attempts to organize a world supercross championship and should not be able to create one this way. AMA Supercross will continue into the future and will maintain its standing as the world’s leading Supercross series.”

Latest Posts

British Superbike: Irwin Quickest In Practice At Oulton Park

Irwin and Bridewell separated by 0.237s at the top...

Video: Garrett Gerloff “Ride To Survive – What Happened In Assen”

American racer Garrett Gerloff and his videographer Brad Schwartzrock...

Volunteers From Yamaha Help Maintain OHV Riding Area In California

Yamaha and Southern California Mountains Foundation Join Forces for...

MotoGP: Grand Prix Of Kazakhstan Postponed Due To Flooding

Editorial Note: The Grand Prix of Kazakhstan was originally...

N2/WERA Endurance Series: Dunlop Posts $50,000 In Contingency

$50,000 Dunlop Dollars Up for Grabs in N2/WERA Endurance...