From a press release issued by Clear Channel Motor Sports:

XSBA Adds Ferodo Brakes

X-Treme Sport Bike Association Announces Braking News

AURORA, Ill.–Clear Channel Entertainment’s Motor Sports division announces today that in addition to Mirror Image Custom Cycles, Corsa Leathers, Impact Video, Street & Strip Magazine, and A&J Recognition, the XSBA has confirmed FERODO BRAKES participation in the X-Treme Sport Bike Association Freestyle Stunt Competitions for the remainder of the 2002 season and perhaps beyond. And this after the first XSBA contingency sponsor, Corsa Leathers from Washington DC has announced their participation in the XSBA National Freestyle Series only one event prior. Mirror Image will present $3000 in XSBA Championship bonus certificates to the top three stunt competitors in National Championship Points following the final round of competition in Portland September 8. Corsa Leathers will also provide a free top line leather jacket to the top qualifying rider at each XSBA round. The first Corsa jacket went to Dan Jackson in the Elkhart Lake XSBA competition. Ferodo Brakes will award a free set of Ferodo Brake pads to the Top 6 Qualifiers in each remaining round of XSBA competition remaining in 2002, in hopes of an increased contingency program for 2003. “We see the potential of growth with the XSBA series as the top sport bike freestyle organization, and are proud to be involved at the ground floor. With at least half of their time spent on the front wheel, we know the demands put on the front brakes, and we are proud to offer our support to the riders in the XSBA”, said Mike Jones, Ferodo Brand Manager for Tucker Rocky. The contingency will be paid with certificates redeamable with Tucker Rocky.

Valuable points will be earned at each round of competition with one bonus point going to each top qualifier. Pocono will pay DOUBLE POINTS for XSBA, and at the conclusion of the 2002 season, an XSBA National Champion will be crowned. Mirror Image will award an $1800 certificate to the XSBA National Champion, $700 certificate to the runner up, and a $500 certificate to the 3rd place stunt rider in Championship points. The certificates can be redeemed at Mirror Image Custom Cycles for custom painting, wheel polishing, and performance suspension upgrading. You may even see a custom designed Corsa XSBA National Champion Jacket at Portland for the 2002 Champ.

The 2002 XSBA Championship Series wheelies into round 3 at Pocono where it all started back in 2001 at the Pocono Cycle Fest August 22-25. XSBA is in its second year of existence as a motorcycle performance stunt exhibition/competition at selected events including the Formula USA Cycle Fest events. Pocono and Portland events will complete the 2002 XSBA season. For more details on the XSBA, entry forms, the point structure, and rules, please visit www.XSBA.com.

For ticket information, please visit www.FormulaUSA.com or call 1-800-216-7482 to charge by phone. Tickets are also available through Ticketmaster.com.

From a press release:

PIRELLI ENTERS FORMULA-USA POCONO ROUND LEADING FOUR OF FIVE PRO ROAD RACING CLASSES

Includes All Four Top Spots In Sportbike Class


(Rome, GA) Pirelli Race Manager Rich Munson was quoted in March at Daytona as saying he believed Pirelli had “most of the 2002 Formula USA grid.” But having most of the racers on your tires doesn’t mean much until the checkered flag flies.

Well, it’s flown in five of F-USA’s eight rounds. And Pirelli racers come into next weekend’s sixth round at Pocono International Raceway in Longpond, PA leading the championship points in four of the five pro classes. This includes holding all four top spots in Pro Honda Oils 600 Supersport, with Craig Connell (Arclight Suzuki), Michael Barnes (Team Hooters Mountain Dew), Lee Acree (Arclight), and Larry Pegram (Team Hooters Mountain Dew); and two of the three top positions in the one pro class they don’t lead.

Besides the top four spots in 600 Supersport, Pirelli guys hold first, second, fifth, and sixth in Lockhart Phillips Unlimited Superbike with Connell, Barnes, Pegram, and Mike Himmelsbach (Blackman’s Racing) respectively; first, third, and fifth in the Buell Lightning series with Clint Brotz (Hal’s Harley-Davidson), Barnes (Kosco H-D/Buell), and Jeff Johnson (Hoban Bros. Racing); Johnson’s first-place position in Thunderbike; and the second and third championship places in the Grand Prix class, with Geoff May (Team Embry/Roadracingworld.com) and Himmelsbach.

Pirelli tires even lead the championship points in at least two amateur classes: Team Promotion’s Leonard Santangelo atop Amateur Open Supersport, and Tom Bibeau of TSE/New England Performance Racing leading Amateur 600 Supersport. There may be more, but the last check of the F-USA amateur classes showed some riders and teams not listing sponsors.

It needs to be mentioned that the vast majority, if not all, of the racers above are riding on Pirelli’s D.O.T. Supercorsa radials.

For more information on Pirelli road race, street, MX and off-road tires, and a free 56-page 2002 Pirelli catalog, contact Pirelli at its new North American address: PIRELLI MOTORCYCLE TIRE DIVISION, P.O. Box 700, Rome, GA, 30162-7000. Phone: (706) 368-5826; Fax: (706) 368-5832.

From a press release issued by the AMA:

Critics falsely claim that motorcyclists are a burden on society

Aug. 16 – At the height of the riding season is when motorcyclists hear it most — misinformed critics charging that people who ride motorcycles are a burden on society because of their medical costs.

But that charge is untrue, the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) reports.

“Some lawmakers, members of the news media and others still subscribe to the ‘social burden’ fallacy that motorcyclists use more taxpayer dollars than other members of society to pay their medical bills,” said Edward Moreland, AMA vice president for government relations. “Studies have shown that is false. Yet it is brought up time and again by those who want to place restrictions on motorcyclists.”

Moreland pointed to a study done at the Harborview Medical Center in Seattle during the 1980s that found 63.4 percent of the injured motorcyclists taken to the trauma center relied on public funds to pay their hospital bills. Critics charged that amounted to taxpayer subsidies for motorcycle injuries, but the director of the trauma center noted that 67 percent of the general patient population relied on public money to pay their hospital bills in the same time period.

Also, a study by the University of North Carolina’s Highway Safety Research Center showed that 49.5 percent of injured motorcyclists had their medical costs covered by insurance, almost identical to the 50.4 percent of other road trauma victims were similarly insured.

In addition, the North Carolina study found that the average costs of motorcyclists’ injuries are actually slightly lower than the costs for other accident victims. The presence or absence of a helmet was not shown to affect injury costs.

Moreland also pointed out that the cost of treating injured motorcyclists is minuscule compared to the nation’s medical costs as a whole. The costs associated with treating all motorcycling injuries account for less than 0.001 percent of total U.S. health-care costs. And a significant percentage of those costs are paid through private insurance.

All told, about 1.16 percent of U.S. health-care costs are related to motor vehicle accidents, and motorcycles represented only 0.53 percent of the accident-involved vehicles nationwide in 1999.

Motorcycling critics often use the social-burden argument in efforts to get state lawmakers to pass, or retain, mandatory helmet-use laws. And in recent years, some motorcycling organizations have bolstered that argument by striking bargains with lawmakers in which motorcyclists agree to accept medical-insurance requirements in exchange for the right to ride without a helmet. These requirements lend support to the flawed social-burden argument, since the same insurance requirements are not imposed on car drivers.

“Some motorcyclists appear willing to agree to these expensive and dangerous economic tradeoffs,” Moreland said. “Lawmakers subscribing to the social-burden theory, coupled with the willingness of some motorcyclists to accept special insurance requirements, could open the door for lawmakers to impose even more unwarranted requirements on motorcyclists.”

The AMA supports voluntary helmet use for adults as part of a comprehensive approach to motorcycling safety, including wearing proper safety gear, getting rider training and educating motorists to watch for motorcycles on the road.

Motorcyclists who wish to respond to the ABC News report appearing Friday night can post their comments on the “World News Tonight Forum” at:
http://boards.abcnews.go.com/cgi/abcnews/request.dll?LIST&room=WorldNewsTonight

Copyright 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

By David Swarts

Team Blimpie Yoshimura Suzuki’s Aaron Yates will not be fined money, assessed a points penalty, disqualified, suspended or disciplined in any official way for lying on an active racetrack at VIR during the AMA Superbike race Sunday, August 11, according to AMA Pro Racing Superbike Operations Manager Ron Barrick.

A few laps into the re-started Superbike race, Eric Bostrom, Mat Mladin, Kurtis Roberts and Yates were running practically nose-to-tail when Roberts lost the rear of his RC51 and spun out in the short transition between Virginia International Raceway’s turns four and five. Yates reacted very quickly and rode off the track to his left to avoid Roberts and the spinning Honda. Once in the short run-off area, Yates tucked the front and crashed his Suzuki GSX-R750 before sliding into inflatable air barriers at a relatively low speed.

After assessing the damage to his bike, Yates returned to the track where he laid down, “spread eagle” in the middle of turn five as Roberts’ bike caught fire. Yates stayed on the track for a few seconds and got up as a pack of three bikes approached.

In the background of Speed Channel’s video of the incident, cornerworkers can be seen ceasing to wave their yellow flag and going for their red flag to stop the race. Immediately after the race was stopped, Yates returned to his Suzuki, picked it up and began to make plans to return to pit lane and make the re-start, which he did, restarting dead last from pit lane.

When asked about the incident shortly after the race Sunday night at VIR, Barrick said, “The cornerworkers had already called in requesting for a stoppage before he laid down anyway. So they were calling ‘red’ for the bike being on the track.”

Asked if any official action would be taken against Yates, Barrick responded, “No. I’d like to talk to him about it, but no. We don’t have any rules on that specifically, but obviously, it’s not something you want riders to think is OK to do. I don’t know what his motive was. I haven’t talked to him. I don’t know if you have any comments from him or not. I don’t know if it was just that he saw his bike was OK and wanted to go back in the race.”

Copyright 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

From an e-mail:

Hello everyone,

Well, John and I are back in Austria. Yes, we are OK and there is major flooding around eastern Europe, but where we are at it’s alright.

Dresden is actually where the Sachsenring is at, outside of it about 40 miles. It’s crazy ’cause we were there about 3 weeks ago.

Prague is flooded pretty bad. We have a mechanic who lives there, and we’re wondering how he’s doing. Next week we are going to Brno which is about 2 hours east of Prague. I think the flooding will put a damper on the race and the spectators.

Salzburg appearently was flooded a bit, too, but like I said, we are in the outskirts of it, so we are alright.

Anyway, our trip over was OK. We arrived into Clermont about 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday. At first, our bags didn’t show for a half hour. We were starting to get pissed off, but eventually they showed. We grabbed our car and headed off to Austria.

We were on the road around 9:00 p.m., and we drove thru Switzerland. It was a funny trip ’cause we only had a map of France. So we knew to head to Zurich to get over to Innsbruck. From Innsbruck, we knew the way. We missed a motorway on the border of France and Switz. So we almost started heading to Italy, but we turned around and drove back thru Switz. We then stopped at a gas station and got a map of Switz. It showed enough of Austria in it to get an idea of where we were going. By this time it was around midnight.

When we got to Zurich, there was a bit of construction going on so we didn’t know which way to go. There were two signs saying the same thing going different directions so we took a guess and fortunately it was the right one. For the longest time, we were the only car on the road. Driving in the middle of the night, lacking sleep, in a foreign country, speaking no language (but English), not quite sure which way to take. Yeah, we are pretty nuts now that we think about it.

Anyways, we found the road to take to Innsbruck. We drove thru Leichtenstein which is a small very, tax-free country. We drove thru that in about 15-20 minutes. Then we saw the sign that says Innsbruck, which was about 150 kms +-. We crossed over to Austria and then drove thru a tunnel that was 14km long. It was sooo long, it seemed long anyway. It was so long that it was starting to get annoying. But how often do you get to go into a long tunnel in the early morning in a beautiful picturesque country? We are very fortunate to be able to do this. As tired and exhausted as we were, it’s always going to be something to remember.

We were about 10 km outside of Salzburg when there was a car accident on the motorway. So we were stopped for about an hour, and then finally it got rolling and we were on our way to Strasswalchen. That’s where the gasthof is. Finally 12 hours later, we arrive in Austria and slept all day. We got up for our meal and then back to bed that night. We are the only ones here along with Phil the truck driver and Donna the PR spokesperson. This weekend we may head up to Eagle’s Nest, which is where Hitler hid during his last days or hours. Until then, hope all is well back home, and it was great to be home for the short time. We had alot of fun.

Des and John

Copyright 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

From e-mail:

I was the corner captain on turn 15 on Friday. I live in Pennsylvania about 30 miles from Bill (Himmelsbach) and knew it was he on the track. I could not believe how long it took for medical to show up after I called for them for Bill’s incident. I called almost immediately. The crash started before my station and he slid down the hill coming to a stop almost in front of my flag station, about 10 yards off the track. My runner was with Bill in seconds, turned to me, requested an ambulance and proceeded to attend to Bill to the extent that we are allowed. He left Bill only to turn off his bike, which was still running.

I could see an ambulance outside the fence at turn 16, which was not moving. (No lights, nothing). I questioned control as to the status of medical and why the ambulance in 16 was not responding. I should have requested the practice be stopped but thought I’d provided control with enough information to make that decision.

The practice was stopped after an inexcusable length of time. The end result was that the medics from 16 after a short drive in the infield walked to the incident. After they had arrived an ambulance showed up on the infield side of the fence.

I was the corner captain on turn 4 on Sunday. I hand-signaled the flagger (who had the radio – I had a scanner) to call control to stop the race as soon as I saw the bike on the racing surface. He did so. The flagger could not see Roberts’ bike or Yates on the track because of the triangles that were in the grass. The fire started while I was requesting the stoppage. From the direction I was running I never saw Yates on the track but I was watching traffic, which was getting heavy, so as not to become part of the incident and the flagger to make sure the red flag came out. I was also concerned that Roberts seemed to be wandering around the bike and may have had his bell rung as he was not paying much attention to the traffic. The red flag was out when I got to the bike and Roberts and Yates were off the track. There were fire bottles coming from turn 5, as they were closer to the incident than we were in turn 4. There were only three of us in turn 4. If I had one or two more people I’d have placed them at the end of the Air Fence approximately at the location of the incident. We do the best we can with what we are given.

The flagger is an experienced cornerworker (including com) and racer. He had a leg injury and was not in the best condition to run and pick up riders and bikes. Considering the elapsed time from the start of the incident to the red flag being shown with the “stop the race” communication to control things happened reasonably well. (Approximately 20 seconds) The red flag was coming out before Yates laid on the track. No one else got involved in the incident. When I’m assigned as a captain, I use the people assigned to me at jobs they are best qualified to perform in the interest of race safety. I did this in turn 4 on Sunday.

Jim Simpson
aka “Homer”
PA Posse and others
Reading, PA



More, via e-mail from a racer:

I wholeheartedly agree with Sean Jordan’s sentiments that cornerworkers are the unsung heroes of road racing. Unfortunately, his comments did little to show any competency on the part of the AMA with respect to its cornerworkers. In fact, many of Sean’s comments actually supported my case.

I’m glad he clocked the response time for cornerworkers to get to Nicky’s bike. Nearly two minutes! In that time, one of Nicky’s teammates could have ridden back to the pits, picked up a fire extinguisher and been back around to put out Nicky’s bike! After all, a lap only takes a 1:26 or so, right? Add in some extra time for the weight of the extinguisher and there you go! Can you actually imagine seeing a World Superbike rider or Grand Prix rider being left unattended following a crash for two minutes? It’s unheard of and completely unacceptable.

The AMA should have had cornerworkers situated so that it would never take that long to get to anyone. If cornerworkers are going to be placed so far from where they’ll be needed, then they should at least be conscientious enough to run (not walk, mosey, or saunter) when someone goes down.

Further, Sean’s argument that the cornerworkers at VIR were quick and efficient is completely thrown out the door when we see what happened to Himmelsbach on Friday. 17 minutes unattended! Broken pelvis, broken ribs, collapsed lung. It is beyond all defense. How can Sean stand behind the AMA and the VIR cornerworkers? I’m sorry, but the AMA has some serious answering to do. Aaron Yates is the least of their safety problems.

Stephen Robinson
AFM #756
San Francisco, CA




My blood is boiling when reading about the Bill Himmelsbach incident. I think there needs to be a wave of Safety Vilgilantes take over the racetracks in this country!

Apparently, riders need to police the racetrack for their own safety. From now on, I encourage all riders who see red flag situations that are not being addressed by race officials to simply stop at the start/finish line, pick up the red flag and stop the race themselves.

The most single most assinine thing in motorcycle racing is that someone in a box removed from an incident is in charge of stopping a race. The situation must be explained by a cornerworker, thought about by a remote person, and then acted upon by the same person who can’t even see what has happened.

What if the friggin’ batteries died in a radio? “Oh well, we don’t have permission from race control to stop this race, I guess this guy and the people who are going to run him over will have to die…”

Last spring at Daytona I saw a guy fall in the first horseshoe; he was laying knocked-out cold so close to the track that one of his hands was on it, right in the impact zone. They pulled an ambulance up, right in the impact zone, got out and worked on the guy like there was no danger, and never stopped the race. Gotta keep the day on schedule I guess.

There should be 3 instances where the corner should be able to call red flag WITHOUT EXPLAINING ANYTHING TO ANYBODY:

1. Body on Track
2. Bike on Track
3. Fluid on Track

If the sanctioning bodies can’t be certain that a cornerworker is smart enough to see that one of those three events has taken place and not stop the race unnecessarily, then they are not smart enough to work in a corner. I don’t think there is any cornerworker who is not smart enough to be trained and entrusted with that much authority.

While people are busy explaining and thinking somebody is going to die.


Max McAllister

Copyright 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

Current Formula USA Grand National Championship Standings:

1. Larry Pegram, 45 points

2. Glen Schnabel, Jr., 38 points

3. Michael Barnes, 36 points

4. Craig Connell, 34 points

5. TIE, Matt Wait/Cory West, 33 points

7. Lee Acree, 28 points

8. TIE, Terry Poovey/Joe Kopp, 26 points

10. TIE, Ray Bowman/Rich King, 22 points


Remaining Grand National Schedule:

8/22-25 Pocono Int’l Raceway, Long Pond, PA, road race

9/5-8 Portland Int’l Raceway, Portland, OR, road race

9/14 Cal Expo, Sacramento, CA, mile dirt track

9/21 Tacoma Dome, Tacoma, WA, short dirt track

10/6 Del Mar Fairgrounds, Del Mar, CA, mile dirt track

10/16-20 Daytona Int’l Speedway, Daytona Beach, FL, road race

Copyright 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

From e-mails:

After watching the races at VIR and reading the feedback in the aftermath of the Aaron Yates incident I felt compelled to add my 2 cents.

What Aaron did was the right thing to do.

How he went about it is where he deserves some criticism.

Given the situation on the track with Robert’s RC-51 the race clearly needed to be red flagged for safety and quickly. From Aaron’s point of view that was not happening and it demanded action. Way to go, Aaron!

Laying down on an active racetrack while interesting on TV and somewhat comedic took a bad situation and made it worse by reducing the number of options approaching riders may have to avoiding an already bad situation. Aaron could have easily been hit again by an approaching bike even further worsening the situation.

I sincerely hope that the AMA isn’t too hard on Aaron, he was doing the right thing. I also hope Aaron Yates will continue to do the right thing in the future.

I just hope he does it a little more professionally.

Tom Tracey
Bartlett, IL



As a racer and cornerworker for the past 13 years, I think David Sadowski’s comments are completely out of order. Aaron Yates did a stupid, dangerous and selfish thing by running back out into traffic and laying down on the track. Commending a rider for doing something like that is the wrong thing to do. Aaron should be fined at the very least and other disciplinary actions may well be needed. This should never ever happen again.

If Aaron was really concerned about getting the track safe, run and pick up the bike, don’t lay down on the track. As a cornerworker I would rather have the racer(s) get off of the hot track to have one less thing to deal with. As a racer, I’m going to see the downed bike and look for a way around it. I don’t need another obstacle in the way. Especially one that purposefully put himself there.

Aaron Yates put himself there for whatever reason. I believe it was a selfish act to ensure a red flag was thrown and let him get back in the race. Whether or not he would ever admit that I do not know.

So no, Dave, Tony is not the idiot.

Craig Bibeau
CRA Racer and Corner Captain



Sadowski has been a great commentator for Speed for the past few years and I respect the guy as he has achieved things in motorcycling that I may never. I also believe that what Yates did was called for and was neccesary.

But for Sadowski to go off like he did on Ianelli (sic) was simply uncalled for. If I were a big wig at Speed, I would be more than a little upset that a prominent spokesman for my network was writing such awful things on the internet and those things were being read by my target audience. Sadowski has every right to speak his mind, but getting personal like he did was juvenile and low class. Dave, I respect you as a racer, but you make a third-grader look mature when it comes to arguments.

Colin Walker



I would also have to agree with Tony Iannarelli, Yates was wrong for laying on the track. But as for Dave Sadowski who has been around racing for many years is one of the biggest idiots I have ever heard on television. I constantly hear him make mistakes on television. One example is, the racers just came from their warm-up lap and were pulling into there grid spots, when Mr. Know It All Sadowski says look the racers are checking their front tires for wear. I don’t think so, Dave, it appeared to me they were looking to see if their front wheels were in the start box! And as far as Dave ripping on the guys in 750 Superstock, get a life loser, these guys can run just as fast as the Superbike guys except for the Superbikes being way faster. I watched all the races this year and I noticed a lot of those privateers are going just as fast as the Superbike stars in the corners, they only get pulled down the straights. I am a personal good friend of the top-finishing privateer Brian Parriott and I will tell you get him a factory Superbike and he will run with the best of them. So I don’t buy this crap run with Jimmy Moore first, then step up, all that did was make you look like a total jerk, and I would enroll in a broadcasting school or something if I were you because you really sound like a moron on television, even commentating the sport that you USED to do! So strike 2 on you.

Tim Kamholz
AFM #15
Newark, CA



I don’t really care about Aaron Yates laying on the track, I mean the race was already red-flagged. I think Sadowski was being kind of a dick in his response to Iannarelli, but I can get over that, maybe he was having a bad day.

What I do care about is the seeming agreement that Sadowski and Iannarelli have made about Supersport bikes not belonging in Superbike. It doesn’t matter what 750 you ride or how fast it is, you’re still in the line of fire of the factory guys and it’s your rider skill and experience that’s going to determine how “spooked” you get. For anyone who thinks a Supersport bike doesn’t belong in Superbike, I have just two words for you: Ricky Orlando (check your Daytona 200 results and yes, that was a Supersport bike minus the wheels).

Rafiq Premji
MRA Expert #408



Dear Mr. Sadowski,

As a Road Racer for 14 years, and Fan for 20+ Years I would have to call your response heavy-handed, and hypocritical.

I for one am sick of you putting down privateers with statements like, “Yeah, this wouldn’t be the first time a backmarker changed the outcome of the race.” Having watched you when you were with V&H, I never figured out how you got your ride. Dave, you were a good rider, not great. John Ashmead has won as many Daytona 200s as you have and he did so on REAL privateer equipment. You are the same bonehead that got tangled up with your teammate and almost jeopardized the 600SS Championship for you and your teammate. I watched you get lapped ON FACTORY BIKES. What was your excuse then? The only thing you did well was dominate F-USA in its waning WERA/NASB days.

Dave, I have read your safety comments and suggestions and am impressed, but you need to get the delusional idea out of your head that, “Only the high and mighty” should race Superbike. Get real. You weren’t that good on one (and, yes, I know the year you raced with Yosh, the bike sucked) as you seem to think. Give the privateer guy a break. I won’t also mention the dozens of mistakes you make every broadcast as I know it is part of your job to help the show have some drama, but some of your mistakes are gross at best. I haven’t written Speed to have you taken off the air, because I am not sure if there is anything better. I highly suggest you keep you comments to yourself unless you think 8 bikes on the grid for a Superbike race is better.

In regards to Aaron Yates’ actions, I find it difficult to criticize him, as I have been a fan of his since he won the Future Stars series in the early 1990s. What he did, though, was inexcusable. THE RED FLAG HAD NOT BEEN THROWN, I saw the videotape. I have tremendous respect for him, as do others in the pits, but what he did was stupid and dangerous. Whether you agree with the attitude and level of AMA safety (I don’t) or not, you have to respect the organization’s control and direction during an event. Obviously the Himmelsbach issue that weekend really illustrated the lack of AMA ability, BUT YOU CAN’T create a more dangerous environment because you don’t like something.

Thanks for supporting the Air Fence and other safety related issues, but get real, dude.

Marcus McBain



In regards to the debate on Aaron Yates lying down in the track, and Dave Sadowski’s insulting reply to one opinion, I’ve always thought that maybe it was my hangup that Dave seemed to be a bit of a bragging punk rather than an enthusiast announcer — enthusiast being like the Brit motorbike announcers on Speed are, and the Canadians announcing their Superbike championship, and car road race and rally announcers that I’ve heard, not to mention announcers of the Isle of Man TT and Endurance championships.

Now I know it wasn’t my problem — DS really is a punk.

Ed Light
Former AFM Los Angeles Chapter Vice President/Secretary



Did I just read David Sadowski accuse Tony Iannarelli of speaking before he thinks?

The whole issue is pretty simple to me really. Aaron Yates walked onto a hot track and he LAID DOWN. Regardless of his motivation for doing this, can anyone seriously support his action?

I hope I’m not an idiot for thinking this, but in my opinion laying down on a hot track is dangerous and irresponsible behavior. Yates risked his own safety as well as that of others still on course.

Had a racer at a small club event done this I am certain that they would face serious penalties. In fact, I am willing to bet they would be thrown out of the club for such an action. While I certainly don’t think that Yates should be thrown out of the series, I do think he deserves disciplinary action for what he did.

Erik Astrup
Davis, CA



First off, Dave, let me say I do enjoy your announcing AMA road racing events, and I respect your expertise derived from your years of road racing.

It is way out of line for you or anyone else to resort to name-calling when you offer your opinion on any subject. Respect is something you earn. Respect is something you lose.

Sorry Dave, you squinty-eyed, big-nosed stutterer, you lost a little of mine.

Rick Stratton
CCS Southwest Expert #37



Regarding David Sadowski’s reply to Tony Iannarelli, I think Sadowski needs to learn to read before he writes. The primary topic of concern to Mr. Iannarelli was Yates’ boneheaded stunt of laying on the track in order to generate a red flag condition. His argument that Yates should be heavily penalized or “stripped” was predicated on this act alone and not his reckless passing of backmarkers which was mentioned as an aside.

The fact that Yates has been an active proponent of improving track safety in no way renders him immune from culpability when it comes to such irresponsible acts of stupidity. And it matters not if the race had already been red-flagged. Since Yates was unaware of this so called “fact” when he decided to perform his interpretation of a human speed-bump, one or more other riders could have also missed the red flag and ran over Yates. What happens then “Mr. Know-it-Alldowski”?

I greatly enjoy Mr. Sadowski’s TV work but a racer’s past record of safety consciousness in the past does not indemnify him from dangerously foolish acts made in the present. “Strike one” for you, Dave, although based on your argument, a case could be made that you’ve actually been badly beaned. Idiot indeed.

If Mr. Sadowski can in good conscience justify the behavior of Aaron “Asphalt Angel” Yates, his credibility as an impartial and honest commentator is questionable as best.

Bruce Sessler
Port Washington, NY




I cannot let this stand without comment. First off, like Mr. Iannarelli, Yates is a rider who I follow and root for. Yates won me over with one of the most incredible displays of control and aggression I’ve ever seen in the ’96 Sears Point AMA Superbike race and I’ve been a fan of his ever since. However, by Yates’ own admission, he ran on to a hot racetrack in order to interfer in an ongoing race. In doing so, he blocked the track with his body, endangering himself and the riders in the ongoing race.

If the safety of the riders in the race was really an issue he had in mind, he could have stayed on his feet and run up the track past the downed bikes, warning the oncoming riders. Instead, he layed down on the track where he would have been visible only to the first rider or two of the oncoming pack. This was not about protecting the oncoming riders, this was about stopping the race by outright interference with the other racers or by requiring an ambulance to be called in order to force a red flag and allow him to stay on the lead lap. This is commendable behavior? Something to be expected of other racers in the future?

I’m not sure what the rest of the letter regarding whether or not the rest of the racers should be on the track in a Superbike race at all has to do with the incident at issue. Is this a call for rear view mirrors? Take it up with the AMA off season. Mr. Iannarelli placed his comment on Yates in traffic in his letter as an aside and it has no bearing on the incident at issue and is only a distraction.

Similarly, the good character references for Yates for prior behavior really have nothing to do with the incident at issue. However, they would be useful in determining the penalty, if one is to be applied for this incident. I’d like to note that I’ve defended Yates on a racer’s listserve over this incident in regard to his career record and have been surprised by the depth of feeling out there from people who have been on the track with him. For a reading of what the fans and racers at large think about the issue, check out the poll on Yates Relaxing On The Track at Dean Adams’ site; it don’t look good….

The comment that Race Control had already called for a red flag is gratuitous blather. So if a smoker is shot during a hold up, it ain’t really murder because the victim was in the process of committing suicide and he was as good as dead anyway?

I won’t dispute that you have more facts than I do, and I invite you to call me all the names you feel you need to, in order to bolster your position. But quantity ain’t quality and I think I see what has happened and what needs to be done more clearly than you.

Joseph Facer



What a refreshing change to have someone in Sadowski’s position actually express a controversial opinion. Even if I didn’t agree with him I’d applaud his forthrightness.

Reg Kittrelle
Scotts Valley, CA



Wow, I never liked Sadowski while he was announcing AMA races on Speed Channel because I just thought he seemed like a loud-mouth jerk but now I can see he’s actually an asshole and quite possibly an idiot, too.

Yates was a fool and I hope they give Sadowski’s contract to Greg White.

Gregor Halenda
Team Incomplete Racing
CCS LRRS USCRA #977



I would like to comment on David Sadowski’s response to Tony Iannarelli’s letter on Roadracing World’s website. His calling Mr. Iannarelli an idiot for expressing his opinion was way out of line. He may disagree with Tony on issues stated in his letter, but to resort to name calling to get his point across was truly a “NO CLASS” act.

I happen to agree with Tony, as do many others according to AMASuperbike.com’s recent poll, that Aaron Yate’s put himself and other riders in danger with his little stunt. While I’m no fan of the AMA Pro Racing organization, what ever penalty they bring down on Aaron is well deserved and I’m sure they will have a hard time taking him seriously about safety issues in the future. And David’s comment that Aaron should not be penalized, he should be commended, shows he has little regard for the other riders’ safety as well!

Greg Ruffin
Oklahoma City, OK



First, I am not a racer, just a fan who likes to ride and go to a track day when he can so I have no special information to share. As a fan who watched all the races this year and was able to see a replay of the Speed “long version” Sunday night of VIR Superbike race 2 I have to comment and ask some questions.

I feel that Yates may have been overly dramatic in his charge out onto the track and laying down but perhaps it was necessary. David Sadowski reported in a previous post that the red flag was already called for, (was it out?), why did Yates feel he needed to go out on the track? Did he know that a red flag had been shown? It seemed incredibly dangerous to me to lay down like that. My opinion, and we note what opinions are like, is that he should not be “punished” but I think it should be made clear that going onto a racetrack and laying down is not recommended.

As for the cornerworkers, well I am not one so I don’t know what they have to put up with but no one should be left unattended at any racetrack for more then a few seconds. This is 2002, soon to be 2003 and there’s no excuse for a major venue not having enough well-trained people available. I was sickened to see Yates pinned under his bike then get up bleeding and have to take care of himself after crashing in a previous race to avoid taking someone else out. Heck he could have gone over the top of Roberts at VIR and probably not crashed. I think Yates should get an award for “being the most willing to crash to save someone else” award. Also, what was up with the guy who kept hanging onto the fire extinguisher as Hayden put out the fire? That poses too many questions in itself, that was really weird – on TV at least. My opinion on the whole thing, cornerworkers need to be well-paid, well-trained, and well-represented at our tracks.

I don’t like these big grids, period! It is ridiculous to have guys out there on machines so outclassed that they are rolling roadblocks. I watch and attend races to see racing, not “full” grids. Now if the grids were “filled” with top riders on top machines, OK. There are only so many factory rides, and then there are only so many outside big sponsor, and there’s only so much top talent. If we need another class so be it but let’s trim the field a bit right now. I have nothing against the guys that don’t have top rides but they do nothing for the entertainment value and they endanger themselves and others. For me, my opinion again, 16 riders would be a great field for some serious racing action. If we really wanted everyone in Superbike, or any race for that matter, we could run a top-16 race then a remainder. Just a thought.

For those who will get all wild over what I’ve written, remember it’s just an opinion.

Joe White
Ames, IA

Copyright 2002, Roadracing World Publishing, Inc.

By David Swarts

Roadracingworld.com World Superbike correspondent Glenn LeSanto is reporting “on very reliable information” that Castrol Honda’s “(Colin) Edwards has signed with Infostrada Ducati.” If true, Edwards will join Neil Hodgson on Ducati’s official factory World Superbike team for the 2003 season.

Edwards has admitted negotiating with Ducati as well as Honda.

LeSanto is also reporting that Harald Eckl will run Kawasaki’s MotoGP team in 2003 and has already signed 2001 World Supersport Champion Andrew Pitt to a letter of intent to ride the new Ninja ZX-RR. No word on a second rider.

In World Supersport news, Belgarda Yamaha has retained the services of Jamie Whitham and Paolo Casoli, and Christian Kellner and Jorg Teuchert will stay with the Yamaha Motor Germany squad.

Ten Kate Honda has signed Karl Muggeridge and Chris Vermeulen for the 2003 World Supersport season. This leaves current Ten Kate Honda rider Fabien Foret, the current World Supersport point leader, unsigned for next season.